Evaluate how leadership styles can be adapted to different situations

However, it can be effective in other situations.

They encourage creativity, and team members are often highly engaged in projects and decisions. Autocratic Leadership Autocratic leadership is an extreme form of transactional leadership, where leaders have complete power over their people.

Evaluate how leadership styles can be adapted to different situations

The idea is for leaders to vary the amount of personal encouragement, support and recognition relationship behaviour and the amount of direction and structure task behaviour according to the nature of the work that people do and their ability and willingness to undertake their tasks. Another benefit is that, because transactional leadership judges team members on performance, people who are ambitious or who are motivated by external rewards — including compensation — often thrive. Workers appreciate feeling valued and will work harder for that manager. If your team lacks creative problem solving skills, conducting workshops and exercises designed to promote innovative thinking can help resolve issues, such as low customer satisfaction, product defects and process delays. The reason detection is so important is because it affords space to maneuver—not in the physical sense of trying to escape another seemingly wasteful meeting, but the mental space that allows you to adjust mid-course based on new information or perspectives, and this is where adapt-ability comes in. It can feel stifling, and it can lead to high staff turnover. Using a Participative Leadership Approach You should adapt your leadership style to incorporate participative leadership techniques when you want to avoid conflict and make decisions by ensuring consensus.

Some help with the development of knowledge and skills is usual. Easy, open communications about these matters are helpful. Charismatic leaders are often focused on themselves, and may not want to change anything.

Transformational leaders want to transform their teams and organizations. Take the time to let the situation unravel and then apply the right leadership style to the right situation.

The risks for the firm and for the individual are clearly considerable. A leader may call on all four styles but generally, fall back on one style under pressure. Their decisiveness and task focus get great short term results.

Different leadership styles

This is because while traits may have an impressive stability over a period of time, they have little consistency across situations. Some of us shrink from the structuring style, especially in a professional environment, because we fear that we may be seen as patronizing. Transformational leaders want to transform their teams and organizations. Photo Credits. The likelihood of misperception is reduced if we talk openly about the appropriateness of using one style rather than another with particular individuals for specific tasks. However, other people believe that in competitive leadership situations, people who practice servant leadership can find themselves left behind by leaders using other leadership styles. Pacesetting— Lead by example and set high expectations for team members. They have high integrity and lead with generosity. Leaders must be flexible and effortlessly move from one leadership style to another to meet the changing requirements of organizations and employees. Analytical — They solve problems and know how best to get a job done.

Check out my website. Generally speaking, those professionals who are technically very competent, self-assured and highly motivated react very well.

The most successful leaders seamlessly switch among different leadership styles. Her freelance work is published on various websites.

Download